|
PAVT
Prorated Average Value Theory |
Close |
|
|
PAVT is an enhanced version of
AVT that uses average rankings
to amass only those points that a ranked player deserves from
the statistical averages.
Just like AVT, key statistics for the past 3 to 5 years are combined with
your league scoring rules to determine the average number of fantasy points
scored. The number of fantasy points scored by the baseline
player at each position is then subtracted from each player. PAVT then
deviates from AVT by using the average rank of players and not the
sequential ranking to determine which player fits into each slot. For
example, only a player with a ranking of 1.0 deserves all of the points
available in slot number one. The prorated points for each slot
can be awarded to none or multiple ranked players. |
| |
|
The Math |
Steps 1 through 4 are identical to AVT.
-
Determine the total number of fantasy points scored each season by the top players over the past 3-5 years.
(Example of top three RBs for each of the past three years)
|
Year |
Player |
Calculation |
Points |
| 2001 |
Faulk, Marshall |
21TDs
* 6pt + 3Fum * -2pts + 2147Yds * .10pts |
335 |
| 2001 |
Holmes, Priest |
10TDs
* 6pt + 3Fum * -2pts + 2169Yds * .10pts |
271 |
| 2001 |
Green, Ahman |
11TDs * 6pts +
4Fum *
-2pts + 1981Yds * .10pts |
256 |
| 2002 |
Holmes, Priest |
24TDs * 6pts + 1Fum
* -2pts + 2287Yds * .10pts |
371 |
| 2002 |
William, Ricky |
17TDs * 6pts +
5Fum *
-2pts + 2216Yds * .10pts |
314 |
| 2002 |
Tomlinson, Ladainian |
15TDs * 6pt +
1Fum *
-2pts + 2172Yds * .10pts |
305 |
| 2003 |
Holmes, Priest |
27TDs * 6pts + 1Fum
* -2pts + 2110Yds * .10pts |
371 |
| 2003 |
Tomlinson, Ladainian |
17TDs * 6pt +
0Fum *
-2pts + 2370Yds * .10pts |
339 |
| 2003 |
Green, Ahman |
20TDs * 6pts +
5Fum *
-2pts + 2259Yds * .10pts |
336 |
-
Determine the average number of fantasy points scored by the top players over the past 3-5 years.
|
Slot |
Calculation |
Points |
| RB1 |
(335Pts + 371Pts + 371Pts) / 3 |
359 |
| RB2 |
(271Pts + 314Pts + 339Pts) / 3 |
308 |
| RB3 |
(256Pts + 305Pts + 336Pts) / 3 |
299 |
-
Determine the baseline player for each position. This needs to be
done very carefully because it is what allows one position to be compared
to another. In this example, the last starter in a
league of 12 teams is used as the baseline. learn more
about baselines...
|
Position |
Worst Starter |
Baseline Points |
| RB |
24th RB |
177 |
-
Subtract the baseline points determined in step 3 from each player and
sort by the resulting value.
|
Slot |
Calculation |
Value |
| RB1 |
359 -
177 |
182 |
| RB2 |
308
- 177 |
131 |
| RB3 |
299 -
177 |
122 |
-
Prorate the value available at each slot based on average rankings.
Each player receives 100% of the value available at the slot for which
they fully qualify and the percentage of the next higher slot that their
ranking indicates they deserve. In this example, the 4th and 5th RB
AVT values are 112 and 96.
|
Rank |
Player |
Average Rank |
Calculation |
Value |
| 1 |
Holmes, Priest |
1.53 |
131 + (2 - 1.53) * (182 -
131) |
155 |
| 2 |
Tomlinson, Ladainian |
1.69 |
131 + (2 - 1.69) * (182 -
131) |
147 |
| 3 |
Green, Ahman |
4.53 |
96 +
(5 - 4.53) * (112 - 96) |
104 |
|
| |
| Positives |
-
Allows players at different positions to
be compared to one another
-
Requires less maintenance than
RLV
(rankings vs. projections)
-
Avoids over-allocation of statistics that
often occurs when making
RLV
projections
-
Reduces AVT exaggeration of the difference
between the strongest and weakest players
-
Merges statistics and current-year
rankings without demanding that past-year performances repeat themselves.
The following table shows the differing results for AVT and PAVT using the
numbers above:
|
|
AVT |
PAVT |
|
Player |
Value |
Player |
Value |
| 1 |
Holmes, Priest |
182 |
|
|
| 2 |
Tomlinson, Ladainian |
131 |
Holmes, Priest
Tomlinson, Ladainian |
155
147 |
| 3 |
Green, Ahman |
122 |
|
|
| 4 |
|
|
Green, Ahman |
104 |
|
|
Negatives |
-
Arithmetic is more complex than AVT or
RLV
-
Very dependent upon the selection of
baseline players for each position.
|
|
During the draft |
|
Like most player value lists, PAVT does not
necessarily specify the order in which players should be drafted.
It can, however, be used during a draft to determine if a player
justifies his draft pick. The goal is to draft a player whose
PAVT
value is
in-line with the other players drafted near the pick. Draft a player
with a lower
PAVT
value than
those around him, and you will have overpaid. A player picked with a
higher
PAVT
value than those around him
is considered a bargain. The most effective use of
PAVT
is to combine it with
drafting tendencies and a real-time analysis of what is going on in the
draft. Average Draft Position (ADP) is helpful for determining where
players are actually being drafted, but determining how much more or less a
player is worth than their original
PAVT
value is dependent upon how many
things can be considered in the time it takes to make a draft pick.
A great drafter will be able to consider factors such as everyone else's roster
status, their estimation of player values, remaining strength at each
position, bye week implications, back-up needs, etc. Computer programs
such as Draft Predictor are
often employed to analyze this data and combine it with a list of player
values to suggest and even predict draft selections. |
| |
|
Acknowledgements |
|
PAVT was created by
Robert Cobb in 2004. |